Deal
Agreement & warranties

Seller liability under section 39 UGB: time limits for business debts

Section 39 UGB limits seller liability after a business transfer. The key points are a five-year maturity window and a separate limitation review.

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Your law firm

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

Salzburg law firm for corporate, company and transaction law

Every transaction is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In company acquisition matters we look at structure, contract, tax and liability together.

4 October 2026 · Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

After a business transfer, the former owner may remain liable for certain business debts. Section 39 of the Austrian Unternehmensgesetzbuch (UGB) sets two time limits: the debt must fall due before five years have elapsed from the transfer, and claims arising from this continuing liability are time-barred within the period applicable to that debt, capped at three years.

The rule depends on the legal relationship taken over and on the individual claim. Its creation, maturity and limitation period must be assessed separately. In a share deal, the company remains the debtor; a change in its shareholders alone is not a business transfer under section 39 UGB.

Assess seller liability

Could section 39 UGB apply to this debt?

Check the business transfer, the legal relationship assumed and the due date. This orientation does not decide a specific claim.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

Was an operating business transferred and continued by the buyer?

Section 39 UGB requires a business transfer. The scope and exclusions in section 38 UGB must also be checked.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

Continuing liability under section 39 UGB may need to be assessed.

The information points to a closer review of statutory seller liability. The limitation period for the specific claim must also be determined. Section 39 UGB caps claims arising from this liability at three years.

This result does not determine whether the relationship was assumed, when limitation began or whether a defence applies.

02

The stated due date is outside the five-year window.

For this debt, the stated due date points against continuing seller liability under section 39 UGB. Other statutory or contractual grounds are not automatically excluded.

03

The transfer of the legal relationship is not clear.

Section 39 UGB concerns a legal relationship assumed by the buyer. A valid objection or a different agreement may affect the allocation. The buyer’s liability under section 38(4) UGB is a separate question.

04

The conditions for a business transfer under section 39 UGB are not established.

In a share deal, the company remains liable for its debts. If only individual assets were transferred, check whether an operating business was also transferred and continued. Other liability rules may still apply.

05

The available information is not enough to calculate the time limits.

The transfer date, the legal relationship assumed, when the debt was established and its due date are needed for a reliable assessment. Instalments may have different due dates.

When section 39 UGB applies to the seller

Section 39 UGB applies when the buyer takes over business-related legal relationships, including rights and liabilities established before the transfer. Under section 38(1) UGB, a buyer who continues a business acquired inter vivos generally assumes its business-related, non-personal legal relationships, unless the parties agree otherwise. The former owner remains liable for the associated debts to the extent set out in section 39.

This is a statutory and time-limited form of continuing seller liability. It does not cover every claim discovered after closing. A valid objection to the transfer of a contractual relationship may leave that relationship with the seller under section 38(2); this differs from liability for a relationship taken over by the buyer under section 39. Sections 38 and 39 also do not apply to acquisitions in enforcement or insolvency proceedings, or while the debtor is supervised by a creditors' trustee (section 38(5)). Continuation by lease, loan for use, usufruct, a right of use, or termination of those contracts does not count as an acquisition under section 38(1) (section 38(5a)). Liability under other provisions remains unaffected (section 38(6)). The first step is to identify the transaction structure and whether the business is actually continued.

Why maturity must fall within five years

Section 39 UGB focuses on when the debt falls due. It must fall due before five years have elapsed from the business transfer. The date on which the obligation was created is not enough by itself. A pre-transfer business debt that falls due four years later is within the window. If that type of pre-existing debt falls due five years and two months after the transfer, it is outside the continued liability governed by section 39.

The applicable contract or other legal relationship determines maturity. Deferred debts and instalments require attention to the agreed payment dates and terms. An accounting entry, invoice or later discovery of a debt does not automatically establish its due date.

How the separate three-year cap works

Section 39 UGB adds a maximum limitation period to the five-year maturity window. The limitation period applicable to the particular debt is the starting point. Claims arising from the seller liability may not remain enforceable for more than three years under this provision.

Section 39 does not establish a separate three-year period that always begins on the transfer date. A concrete calculation requires the claim and the rules governing when its limitation period begins. The five-year period determines when the debt must fall due. It does not create a general total period of five plus three years.

When contractual exclusions affect a creditor

Warranties and indemnities in the purchase agreement allocate risk between buyer and seller. They do not automatically change a creditor’s rights. Under section 38(4) UGB, an agreement excluding the buyer’s liability for a debt connected with a legal relationship that was not taken over is effective against a third party only if it is entered in the commercial register at the time of transfer, made public in a customary manner, or notified to the third party by the seller or buyer.

Section 38(4) concerns buyer liability where a business relationship is not taken over. That issue must be kept separate from the seller’s continuing liability under section 39. Our guide to the warranty and indemnity catalogue explains how contractual protections can be structured between the parties.

Which records make the time limits verifiable

A reliable review starts with a schedule of business debts. For each item, record its legal basis, when it was established, its due date, any deferral and any security. Keep evidence of the transfer date and the relevant contract documents. Where payment is deferred or split into instalments, do not infer maturity from a balance sheet alone.

Buyer and seller can compare this schedule with the disclosures and risk allocation in the purchase agreement. The due diligence checklist helps organize the review documents and open issues. Our guide to legacy liabilities in an asset deal addresses the buyer’s statutory exposure.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about section 39 UGB

Does all seller liability end five years after the transfer? +

The five-year period in section 39 UGB concerns when the particular debt must fall due. Claims covered by the provision are also subject to the applicable limitation period, capped at three years. Other contractual or statutory grounds of liability require a separate assessment.

Does the three-year cap always run from the sale date? +

Section 39 UGB does not set a universal start date at the time of transfer. The claim and the applicable limitation rules determine when the period begins.

Does section 39 UGB apply to a sale of shares? +

In a share deal, the company remains the same legal entity and continues to owe its debts. A change in shareholders alone does not trigger the seller liability under section 39 UGB; the question is whether a business was actually transferred and continued within the meaning of the provision.

Topics
Seller liabilityBusiness debtsBusiness transferSection 39 UGB

Structuring a deal, reviewing a contract, securing the risks?

When buying a company, structure, review and contract decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg